The expected devaluation of the dollar would have a similar impact — making it more expensive for U. S firms to purchase supplies overseas, resulting in trade being reduced even further. The U. Some countries have adopted it as the official currency, while in others it exists side-by-side with a local currency that is often "pegged" to the dollar to keep its value stable. In the event that a default drove down the value of the dollar, countries with highly dollarized economies would see the buying power of existing currency stock diminished.
Around the world, many cross-border transactions carry requirements that they be settled in U. In ordinary times, this is seen as a practical way to be sure that sudden swings in the value of a local currency don't dramatically disadvantage one party in a transaction that is to be settled in the future.
A sudden and sharp decline in the value of the dollar would mean that individuals and companies anticipating payment on existing contracts in dollars would effectively be receiving less than they had expected for their goods and services.
More sophisticated trade contracts may contain anti-default clauses that require agreements to be renegotiated in the event of a default that drives down the value of a reserve currency. While this would keep both parties to a contract whole, it would also complicate and likely slow down many transactions. One of the economic advantages the United States has long enjoyed is that it is a magnet for global capital. When the global economy is strong, investors seeking growth funnel money to U.
These borrowers are on the cusp of default. How can the credit-rating agencies get away with this? Back then, the underlying loans were risky too, and everyone knew that some of them would default. But it seemed unlikely that many of them would default at the same time. The loans were spread across the entire country and among many lenders.
Then housing prices fell 30 percent across the board and defaults skyrocketed. For CLOs, the rating agencies determine the grades of the various layers by assessing both the risks of the leveraged loans and their default correlation.
In theory, CLOs are constructed in such a way as to minimize the chances that all of the loans will be affected by a single event or chain of events. The rating agencies award high ratings to those layers that seem sufficiently diversified across industry and geography. But all you have to do is look at a list of leveraged borrowers to see the potential for trouble. These are all companies hard hit by the sort of belt-tightening that accompanies a conventional downturn. We are not in the midst of a conventional downturn.
Also added to the list was Hoffmaster, which makes products used by restaurants to package food for takeout. Companies you might have expected to weather the present economic storm are among those suffering most acutely as consumers not only tighten their belts, but also redefine what they consider necessary.
Even before the pandemic struck, the credit-rating agencies may have been underestimating how vulnerable unrelated industries could be to the same economic forces. A article by John Griffin, of the University of Texas, and Jordan Nickerson, of Boston College, demonstrated that the default-correlation assumptions used to create a group of CLOs should have been three to four times higher than they were, and the miscalculations resulted in much higher ratings than were warranted.
Under current conditions, the outlook for leveraged loans in a range of industries is truly grim. Now moviegoing and party-throwing are paused indefinitely—and may never come back to their pre-pandemic levels. The program is controversial: Is the Fed really willing to prop up CLOs when so many previously healthy small businesses are struggling to pay their debts?
As of mid-May, no such loans had been made. Other banks, including Bank of America, reportedly bought lower layers of CLOs in May for about 20 cents on the dollar. Read: How the Fed let the world blow up in Meanwhile, loan defaults are already happening.
There were more in April than ever before. Several experts told me they expect more record-breaking months this summer. It will only get worse from there. If leveraged-loan defaults continue, how badly could they damage the larger economy? What, precisely, is the worst-case scenario? For the moment, the financial system seems relatively stable.
Banks can still pay their debts and pass their regulatory capital tests. But recall that the previous crash took more than a year to unfold. The present is analogous not to the fall of , when the U. The purpose is to show that it could. That alone should scare us all—and inform the way we think about the next year and beyond.
Later this summer, leveraged-loan defaults will increase significantly as the economic effects of the pandemic fully register. Bankruptcy courts will very likely buckle under the weight of new filings. During a two-week period in May, J. Crew, Neiman Marcus, and J. I Accept Show Purposes. Your Money. Personal Finance. Your Practice. Popular Courses. Article Sources. Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts.
We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy. Compare Accounts. The offers that appear in this table are from partnerships from which Investopedia receives compensation.
This compensation may impact how and where listings appear. Investopedia does not include all offers available in the marketplace. Related Articles. Macroeconomics How the U. Dollar Became the World's Reserve Currency. Oil How Petrodollars Affect the U. Economics What Is Money? Partner Links.
A super currency would replace the U. The rebound in oil prices has improved the prospects of countries such as Nigeria, Russia, and Saudi Arabia. Brazil, which was hit hard by the second wave of the coronavirus in the first half of this year, could get a boost from rising vaccination rates and the upturn in the commodity cycle.
Along with the upward shift in U. Policymakers in many major economies now face the difficult conundrum of supporting growth while keeping inflation under control, even as they continue to be hit by domestic and external supply disruptions. Additional stimulus measures, especially monetary easing, are likely to yield an increasingly unfavorable trade-off between short-term benefits and longer-term vulnerabilities.
Governments and central banks will need to develop a carefully targeted mix of policies in response to the complicated circumstances they now face. First, redouble efforts to limit resurgence of the virus, which remains a wildcard for short-term growth. Second, use fiscal policy judiciously to support short-term demand while also improving long-term productivity. Third, exercise restraint with monetary policy and start reducing but not yet reverse the amount of support it provides to the economy.
0コメント